HTML Guide

Bad value “auto” for attribute “height | weight” on element “img”: Expected a digit but saw “a” instead.

The width and height attributes on <img> elements expect a digit to specify the dimension in pixels. It should not contain units, letters or percent signs.

You can achieve this using CSS instead, for example:

<!-- Invalid syntax, the height attribute expects only digits -->

<img src="photo.jpg" alt="cat" height="auto" />

<!-- Valid syntax using CSS -->

<img src="photo.jpg" alt="cat" style="height: auto"  />

Learn more:

MDN: the img element

Related W3C validator issues

Bad value “auto” for attribute “height” on element “video”: Expected a digit but saw “a” instead.

The height attribute on the <video> element must be a non-negative integer representing the height in CSS pixels. The value “auto” is not a valid value for this attribute. To resolve the issue, set the height attribute to a specific numeric value or adjust the height using CSS instead.

Example with a numeric height value:

<video width="640" height="360" controls>
  <source src="movie.mp4" type="video/mp4">
  Your browser does not support the video tag.
</video>

Alternatively, control the height using CSS:

<video width="640" controls style="height: auto;">
  <source src="movie.mp4" type="video/mp4">
  Your browser does not support the video tag.
</video>

In the CSS approach, “auto” can be used, but it should not be part of the HTML attributes.

Bad value “auto” for attribute “width” on element “img”: Expected a digit but saw “a” instead.

The width attribute on the img element must be a positive integer representing the number of pixels.

The HTML img element’s width and height attributes are expected to specify image dimensions in pixels. According to the HTML Living Standard, these attributes accept only non-negative integers. These integers define the rendered dimension of the image, overriding the actual image size based on its native resolution. The value “auto” is not a valid integer, which leads to the validation error you’ve encountered.

Here is a correct usage example of the img element:

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
  <title>Valid Image Width</title>
</head>
<body>
  <img src="example.jpg" alt="Example image" width="200" height="100">
</body>
</html>

In the example above, the width is set to 200, and the height is set to 100. Both values are non-negative integers representing pixel dimensions. If you intend to maintain the image’s aspect ratio while adjusting another dimension, you can omit one of the attributes, and modern browsers will automatically adjust the aspect ratio based on the given dimension.

Bad value “auto” for attribute “width” on element “video”: Expected a digit but saw “a” instead.

The error message is indicating that the width attribute of the <video> element has an invalid value. According to the HTML specification, the width attribute expects a non-negative integer value, representing the pixel width of the video.

The value "auto" is not valid for the width attribute. Instead, specify a full number that indicates the pixel width of the video. If you want the video to be responsive without specifying a fixed width, you can use CSS to achieve that.

Here are two ways to resolve this:

Specify a valid pixel value for width:

<video width="640" height="360" controls>
  <source src="video.mp4" type="video/mp4">
  Your browser does not support the video tag.
</video>

Use CSS for a responsive video player:

Instead of using the width attribute, use CSS to set the width of the video element. This allows the video to adjust its size according to the container or viewport.

<style>
  .responsive-video {
    width: 100%;
    height: auto;
  }
</style>

<video class="responsive-video" controls>
  <source src="video.mp4" type="video/mp4">
  Your browser does not support the video tag.
</video>

In the second example, the video will scale based on its containing element, maintaining its aspect ratio due to the height: auto; CSS rule. This approach offers more flexibility for responsive design.

Bad value “” for attribute “(width|height)” on element “iframe”: The empty string is not a valid non-negative integer.

Bad value “” for attribute “(width|height)” on element “img”: The empty string is not a valid non-negative integer.

Bad value X for attribute “(width | height)” on element “iframe”: Expected a digit but saw “.” instead.

The attributes width and height on an iframe expect a valid positive integer without any decimals.

Here’s an example of incorrect code where decimals are being used for dimension attributes:

<iframe src="example.html" height="602.88" width="800.2"></iframe>

Corrected code without decimals:

<iframe src="example.html" height="603" width="800"></iframe>

In the corrected code, the width and height values has been changed to a whole number, which conforms to the standard integer value expected by the W3C validator.

Bad value X for attribute “(width | height)” on element “img”: Expected a digit but saw “.” instead.

The attributes width and height on an iframe expect a valid positive integer without any decimals.

Here’s an example of incorrect code where decimals are being used for dimension attributes:

<img src="photo.jpg" alt="Dog" height="602.88" width="800.2">

Corrected code without decimals:

<img src="photo.jpg" alt="Dog" height="603" width="800">

In the corrected code, the width and height values has been changed to a whole number, which conforms to the standard integer value expected by the W3C validator.

Bad value “%” for attribute “width” or “height” on element “object”: Expected a digit but saw “%” instead.

Attribute values for width and height on the object element must be a valid integer (pixels), not a percentage.

In HTML5, the width and height attributes for the <object> element must be specified in pixels as an integer value, such as height="500". Using percentage values like height="100%" is not allowed in the attribute according to the HTML living standard and will trigger a validation error. To set a percentage height, use the CSS width and height properties instead.

Correct usage (pixels via attribute):

<object data="example.pdf" type="application/pdf" width="600" height="400"></object>

Correct usage (percentage via CSS):

<object data="example.pdf" type="application/pdf" style="width: 100%; height: 100%;"></object>

Example of a full valid HTML document using CSS for 100% height:

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
  <title>Object Height Example</title>
  <style>
    html, body {
      height: 100%;
      margin: 0;
    }
    object {
      height: 100%;
      width: 100%;
      display: block;
    }
  </style>
</head>
<body>
  <object data="example.pdf" type="application/pdf"></object>
</body>
</html>

Bad value “Xpx” for attribute “width | height” on element “img | iframe”: Expected a digit but saw “p” instead.

The width and height attributes on <img> and <iframe> elements expect a digit to indicate the number of pixels. Ensure that this attribute contains only digits.

For example:

<!-- This is invalid because width is not a digit -->

<img width="225px" height="100px" alt="cat" src="cat.jpg" />

<!-- This is valid -->

<img width="225" height="100" alt="cat" src="cat.jpg" />

Attribute “height” not allowed on element “table” at this point.