Accessibility Guide for Section 508

An image map consists of a single image with numerous clickable sections. Because screen readers cannot translate graphics into text, an image map, like all images, must contain alternative text for each of the distinct clickable parts, as well as for the larger image itself.

In the absence of alternative text, screen readers often announce the image’s filename. Filenames do not accurately describe images and are therefore inconvenient for screen reader users.

What this Accessibility Rule Checks

Ensures that image map area elements have alternative text.

Make sure that the kind attribute in the track element is set to captions. Also, verify that the text content of the captions adequately communicates all relevant information from the audio element, including speaker identification, dialogue transcripts, musical cues, and sound effects.

Below is an example code that demonstrates the addition of two tracks, one in English and another in Spanish.

<audio>
   <source src="conversation.mp3" type="audio/mp3">
   <track src="captions_en.vtt" kind="captions" srclang="en" label="english_captions">
   <track src="captions_es.vtt" kind="captions" srclang="es" label="spanish_captions">
</audio>

What this Accessibility Rule Checks

Checks the use of all HTML5 <audio> elements to ensure each contains a <track> element with the kind attribute value captions.

This rule demands the absence of any blink elements. Blinking items might be challenging to activate, and flashing writing can be challenging to read.

The blink tag causes information to blink, as the name implies. Although you might enjoy the appearance, blinking text and objects (such as links and buttons) might be challenging to read and operate, especially for people with poor hand-eye coordination or limited dexterity.

For those who have visual or cognitive impairments, reading blinking letters can be quite challenging. Text that blinks can be annoying, especially for people who have cognitive difficulties. Some people may find it challenging to understand. The blink element should never be used due to these reasons.

What this Accessibility Rule Checks

Verifies that the blink element is never utilized.

For screen reader users, buttons must include recognizable text that specifies the destination, purpose, function, or action.

Users of screen readers are unable to determine the function of elements with the roles role="link", role="button", and role="menuitem" that lack an accessible name.

What this Accessibility Rule Checks

Verifies that each button has a distinguishable, accessible label.

Each page must have a main landmark to allow users to rapidly traverse repetitive blocks of material or interface elements (such as the header and navigation) and get the primary content.

Due to the fact that websites frequently display secondary, repetitive content on several pages (such as navigation links, heading graphics, and advertising frames), keyboard-only users benefit from faster, more direct access to a page’s principal content. This saves keystrokes and reduces physical discomfort.

It is more difficult and time-consuming for users who cannot use a mouse to navigate using the keyboard if the interface does not provide features to facilitate keyboard navigation. To activate a link in the middle of a web page, for instance, a keyboard user may have to browse through a significant number of links and buttons in the page’s header and primary navigation.

Extremely motor-impaired users may require several minutes to browse through all of these pieces, which can cause to tiredness and potential physical pain for some users. Even users with less severe limitations will require more time than users with a mouse, who can click on the desired link in less than a second.

What this Accessibility Rule Checks

Checks for the presence of at least one of the following features:

• an internal skip link
• a header
• a geographical landmark

When used in a document, the frame or iframe element’s title attribute must not be empty in order to provide context for users of screen reader software.

Users of screen readers depend on the title of a frame to describe its contents. If the HTML for a frame or iframe element lacks a title attribute, navigating within the element can be a frustrating and time-consuming experience for users of this technology.

Users of screen readers can see a list of the frames on a page and their respective titles. Providing each frame with a distinct, descriptive label facilitates easy navigation. Without titles, it’s easy to get lost trying to jump from one frame to the next. Screen readers will instead provide information like “frame,” “JavaScript,” the filename, or the URL if no title is provided. This data is unlikely to be useful in most situations.

What this Accessibility Rule Checks

Make sure the title attribute of every iframe and frame element is both distinct and not empty.

To express their purpose and meaning to screen reader users, all images must include alternative text.

Even if the image just contains text, screen readers have no way of translating it into words that are read to the user. As a result, photos must have concise, descriptive alt text so that screen reader users grasp the image’s contents and purpose.

If you can’t see, all visual information, such as photographs, is meaningless unless a digital text equivalent is provided so that screen readers may translate that text into either sound or braille. People with limited eyesight or colorblindness experience the same phenomenon to varied degrees.

Screen readers cannot translate an image into speech or braille to make it available by sound or touch if you do not provide a suitable alternative that works for their available sensory modalities, such as making an image accessible by providing a digital text description.

What this Accessibility Rule Checks

Ensures that all <image> elements have alternative text and either role="presentation" or role="none" (ARIA 1.1).

Ensures that input buttons have legible text.

Without an accessible name, screen reader users cannot determine the purpose of a input type="button".

Without a discernible and accessible name, screen reader users cannot grasp the purpose of an image. A title for a photograph may just convey advisory information about the image. When used as a control, unnamed actionable visual images such as buttons have no clear definition of the destination, purpose, function, or action for the non-text material.

What this Accessibility Rule Checks

The text on input buttons must be readable.

Makes certain that <input type="image"> elements have alternative text.

Screen reader users will not understand the function of a <input type="image"> button unless equivalent wording is provided. Even if the image merely contains text, alternative text is required because a screen reader cannot interpret images of words into output.

Simply typing text adjacent to the form element will not result in a true label. Screen readers, for example, require labels in code that can be determined automatically.

Some screen readers are configured to estimate the label based on the surrounding text, however this method is not foolproof and might cause confusion if the screen reader guesses incorrectly.

What this Accessibility Rule Checks

Ensures that each <input type="image"> has a name that can be found.

Each form element must have a label element attached with it programmatically.

Forms must have effective form labels in order to be accessible. Form elements like as checkboxes, radio buttons, input fields, etc. are frequently self-explanatory to sighted users, even if they are not programmatically labeled. Users with screen readers require descriptive form labels to identify form fields. Adding labels to all form elements removes uncertainty and makes the product more accessible.

When form elements lack labels, screen reader users are unaware of the expected data input. Screen readers cannot determine information about input items programmatically in the absence of an established label association (or redundant text functioning as a label).

Since clicking the label activates the control, people with weak motor control do not benefit from a bigger clickable area for the control.

What this Accessibility Rule Checks

Ensures that each form element has a label associated with it programmatically.

When used as links, link text and alternative text for images must be recognizable by screen readers, have no duplicate labels, and be focusable.

• Accessibility is hindered by inaccessible link components, as they are a crucial component of a website.
• Users who traverse a webpage using only the keyboard (and no mouse) can only click on links that can gain programmed emphasis. Inaccessible to these users is any link that cannot gain programmatic focus.
• Similar to sighted people, screen reader users must know where a link leads. This information is provided via inner link text, albeit it will not be utilized if a screen reader cannot access it.
• Only the links and form components that can get programmatic focus can be activated by keyboard users, including those with visual impairments or those who cannot use a mouse. Keyboard users cannot access events activated only by other sorts of focus, such as onmouseover events that depend on the mouse hover focus. By default, only links and form elements receive keyboard emphasis. Add tabindex="0" to items that are not links or form components to make them focusable.

What this Accessibility Rule Checks

Ensures that each link’s name is accessible.

To be read out to screen reader users, all embedded objects must have text alternatives.

There is no mechanism for screen readers to convert non-text items into text that is announced to users. They read aloud the alternative text instead. There must be brief, descriptive alternative text in embedded “object” components allowing screen reader users to access the information.

An embedded object in a document is defined by the “object” element. It is used to incorporate another web page or multimedia (audio, video, applets, etc.) into the document. There must be a text alternative for the object element in order for screen reader users to understand what the object contains.

When creating alternative text, keep in mind that its goal is to inform blind users about the information included in and intended usage of the image. Blind users should be able to derive the same amount of information from alternative text as a sighted user does from the image. The image’s objective, purpose, and significance should be explained in the alternative text.

The following considerations are beneficial to bear in mind when creating alternative text:

• Why is this page featuring non-text content?
• What data is it displaying?
• What function does it serve?
• What words would I use to communicate the same information or purpose if I couldn’t use the non-text content?

Make sure this attribute’s entire text is relevant. Generally speaking, terms like “chart”, “picture”, “diagram”, or image file names are not very helpful.

What this Accessibility Rule Checks

Ensures that each object element has an alternative text.

Ensures that components with the label role="img" have an alternative text.

Even if an image merely contains text, screen readers are unable to convert it into words that the user can hear. As a result, alternative language for images must be brief, descriptive, and easily understandable so that screen reader users may understand the image’s contents and intended application.

Without an accessible text alternative that screen readers can translate into sound or braille, all visual information, including images, is utterly useless if you can’t see. Accessible alternative text is also necessary to variable degrees for people with low vision or color blindness problems.

If an image does not have a text alternative that is accessible, screen readers cannot translate the information in the image to voice or braille.

What this Accessibility Rule Checks

Elements with the property value role="img" must additionally have markup that specifies accessible alternative text for the image.

A label element with a programmatic association must be included for each select element.

To make forms accessible, they must have clear form labels. Even if a form element isn’t programmatically named, sighted users can usually tell what it’s for when they see checkboxes, radio buttons, input fields, etc. To identify form fields, screen reader users need clear form labels. All form elements should have labels to remove confusion and make the product more accessible.

Screen reader users are in the dark about the expected input data when form elements lack labels. Without a defined label connection (or redundant text acting as a label), screen readers cannot automatically determine information about input items.

What this Accessibility Rule Checks

ensures that each select element has a label that is associated with it programmatically.

An image map that is server-side rather than client-side is present in the page.

Server-side image maps can’t be used with a keyboard since mouse clicks are needed to access the links they contain, rendering them unavailable to users who only use keyboards.

The server-side software used to process the image map receives the locations of the mouse click from server side image maps. They are not keyboard accessible since they rely on mouse clicks, although client-side image mappings are. Additionally, unlike the regions of a client-side picture map, actionable areas of a server-side image map cannot be provided with text alternatives.

What this Accessibility Rule Checks

Makes sure that server-side image maps are not used.

Ensures that SVG elements with the roles img, graphics-document or graphics-symbol have a text alternative that is accessible.

In order to make information provided by non-text material (including SVG graphics) accessible, Success Criterion 1.1.1 requires the usage of a text alternative. Because they can be portrayed through any sensory modality (for example, visual, auditory, or tactile) to suit the user’s needs, text alternatives are a fundamental method of making information accessible. By including text alternatives, a wider range of user agents can present the content in different ways.

For instance, a person who is blind can request that the text equivalent of an image be read out using synthetic speech. An audio file’s text alternative can be presented for people who cannot hear it, allowing them to read it. Text alternatives will eventually make it simpler to translate information into sign language or a more basic version of the same language.

What this Accessibility Rule Checks

The algorithm for this rule returns:

• True if the element has a <title>code child

<svg id="target"><title>Time II: Party</title></svg>

• True if the <title> child has text nested in another element.

<svg id="target"><title><g>Time II: Party</g></title></svg>

• False if the element has no <title> child.

<svg id="target"></svg>

• False if the <title> child is empty.

<svg id="target"><title></title></svg>

• False if the <title> is a grandchild.

<svg id="target"><circle><title>Time II: Party</title></circle></svg>

• False if the <title> child has only whitespace.

<svg id="target"><title> \t\r\n </title></svg>

• False if there are multiple titles and the first is empty.

<svg id="target"><title></title><title>Time II: Party</title></svg>

Markup for data tables can be tedious and perplexing. There are several capabilities in screen readers that make it easier to navigate tables, but for these features to function properly, tables must be precisely marked up. Instead than utilizing a caption element, some tables visually imply a caption by employing cells with the colspan element.

Tables are announced in a certain way by screen readers. The potential for unclear or erroneous screen reader output exists when tables are not properly marked up.

Screen reader users cannot understand the purpose of the table visually when tables are not marked up with an actual caption element but rather use a colspan element on cells to visually indicate a caption.

What this Accessibility Rule Checks

Verifies that data tables are identified with table cells that utilize a colspan element to visually convey a caption.

Markup for data tables can be tedious and perplexing. Tables must be semantically marked up and have the proper header structure. Table navigation is made easier by features in screen readers, but for these capabilities to function properly, the tables must be precisely marked up.

Tables are announced in a certain way by screen readers. The potential for unclear or erroneous screen reader output exists when tables are not properly marked up.

Screen reader users are unable to correctly understand the relationships between the cells and their contents visually when tables are not adequately structured and marked up semantically.

What this Accessibility Rule Checks

Verifies the correct header structure and semantic markup of data tables.

Markup for data tables can be tedious and perplexing. Tables should be marked up correctly in terms of header format and semantics. Table navigation is made easier by features in screen readers, but for these capabilities to function properly, the tables must be precisely marked up.

Tables are announced in a certain way by screen readers. The potential for unclear or erroneous screen reader output exists when tables are not properly marked up.

Sighted people can typically identify the table’s headers and their relevance to the data at a glance. This needs to be done in the markup for non-sighted users.

When a data table is created with accessibility in mind, the user can go from cell to cell while hearing the screen reader proclaim the matching table headers for the data cells. This is known as table navigation mode. When navigating through huge data tables or when cells include similar-sounding data that could be easily misconstrued, hearing the table headers is extremely useful.

But if the table lacks accessibility features, the table navigation method is useless.

What this Accessibility Rule Checks

Verifies the correct header structure and semantic markup of data tables.

Markup for data tables can be tedious and perplexing. Tables should be marked up correctly in terms of header format and semantics. Table navigation is made easier by features in screen readers, but for these capabilities to function properly, the tables must be precisely marked up.

Tables are announced in a certain way by screen readers. The potential for unclear or erroneous screen reader output exists when tables are not properly marked up.

Screen reader users are unable to correctly understand the relationships between the cells and their contents visually when tables are not adequately structured and marked up semantically.

What this Accessibility Rule Checks

Verifies that each header cell is referred to as a header of a column or row in data tables by checking their markup.

A track element with the property set to kind="captions" is required for an HTML5 video element. For deaf viewers, the captions must include all audible cues from the video, such as dialogue, musical cues, sound effects, and other pertinent information.

Users who are hard of hearing have limited or no access to a video’s content if it lacks a caption. Even if there is a captioning track, make sure it includes all of the video’s important content and not just the dialogue.

Without captions, deaf viewers are able to see everything in the video but are unable to hear anything. The dialogue, narration, and other crucial sounds that are not spoken by people—such as “dramatic instrumental music,” clapping, screaming, or other sounds that create the scene, provide context, or otherwise give meaning to the video—are not audible to deaf viewers without a caption track.

What this Accessibility Rule Checks

Makes sure all video elements have captions.