Axe Core Guide
<object> elements must have alternative text
To be read out to screen reader users, all embedded objects must have text alternatives.
There is no mechanism for screen readers to convert non-text items into text that is announced to users. They read aloud the alternative text instead. There must be brief, descriptive alternative text in embedded “object” components allowing screen reader users to access the information.
An embedded object in a document is defined by the “object” element. It is used to incorporate another web page or multimedia (audio, video, applets, etc.) into the document. There must be a text alternative for the object element in order for screen reader users to understand what the object contains.
When creating alternative text, keep in mind that its goal is to inform blind users about the information included in and intended usage of the image. Blind users should be able to derive the same amount of information from alternative text as a sighted user does from the image. The image’s objective, purpose, and significance should be explained in the alternative text.
The following considerations are beneficial to bear in mind when creating alternative text:
- Why is this page featuring non-text content?
- What data is it displaying?
- What function does it serve?
- What words would I use to communicate the same information or purpose if I couldn’t use the non-text content?
Make sure this attribute’s entire text is relevant. Generally speaking, terms like “chart”, “picture”, “diagram”, or image file names are not very helpful.
What this Accessibility Rule Checks
Ensures that each object element has an alternative text.
Learn more:
Related Accessibility Rules
Each page must have a main landmark to allow users to rapidly traverse repetitive blocks of material or interface elements (such as the header and navigation) and get the primary content.
Due to the fact that websites frequently display secondary, repetitive content on several pages (such as navigation links, heading graphics, and advertising frames), keyboard-only users benefit from faster, more direct access to a page’s principal content. This saves keystrokes and reduces physical discomfort.
It is more difficult and time-consuming for users who cannot use a mouse to navigate using the keyboard if the interface does not provide features to facilitate keyboard navigation. To activate a link in the middle of a web page, for instance, a keyboard user may have to browse through a significant number of links and buttons in the page’s header and primary navigation.
Extremely motor-impaired users may require several minutes to browse through all of these pieces, which can cause to tiredness and potential physical pain for some users. Even users with less severe limitations will require more time than users with a mouse, who can click on the desired link in less than a second.
What this Accessibility Rule Checks
Checks for the presence of at least one of the following features:
- an internal skip link
- a header
- a geographical landmark
When used in a document, the frame or iframe element’s title attribute must not be empty in order to provide context for users of screen reader software.
Users of screen readers depend on the title of a frame to describe its contents. If the HTML for a frame or iframe element lacks a title attribute, navigating within the element can be a frustrating and time-consuming experience for users of this technology.
Users of screen readers can see a list of the frames on a page and their respective titles. Providing each frame with a distinct, descriptive label facilitates easy navigation. Without titles, it’s easy to get lost trying to jump from one frame to the next. Screen readers will instead provide information like “frame,” “JavaScript,” the filename, or the URL if no title is provided. This data is unlikely to be useful in most situations.
What this Accessibility Rule Checks
Make sure the title attribute of every iframe and frame element is both distinct and not empty.
When used as links, link text and alternative text for images must be recognizable by screen readers, have no duplicate labels, and be focusable.
- Accessibility is hindered by inaccessible link components, as they are a crucial component of a website.
- Users who traverse a webpage using only the keyboard (and no mouse) can only click on links that can gain programmed emphasis. Inaccessible to these users is any link that cannot gain programmatic focus.
- Similar to sighted people, screen reader users must know where a link leads. This information is provided via inner link text, albeit it will not be utilized if a screen reader cannot access it.
-
Only the links and form components that can get programmatic focus can be activated by keyboard users, including those with visual impairments or those who cannot use a mouse. Keyboard users cannot access events activated only by other sorts of focus, such as
onmouseoverevents that depend on the mouse hover focus. By default, only links and form elements receive keyboard emphasis. Addtabindex="0"to items that are not links or form components to make them focusable.
What this Accessibility Rule Checks
Ensures that each link’s name is accessible.
Ensures that components with the label role="img" have an alternative text.
Even if an image merely contains text, screen readers are unable to convert it into words that the user can hear. As a result, alternative language for images must be brief, descriptive, and easily understandable so that screen reader users may understand the image’s contents and intended application.
Without an accessible text alternative that screen readers can translate into sound or braille, all visual information, including images, is utterly useless if you can’t see. Accessible alternative text is also necessary to variable degrees for people with low vision or color blindness problems.
If an image does not have a text alternative that is accessible, screen readers cannot translate the information in the image to voice or braille.
What this Accessibility Rule Checks
Elements with the property value role="img" must additionally have markup that specifies accessible alternative text for the image.
Ensures that SVG elements with the roles img, graphics-document or graphics-symbol have a text alternative that is accessible.
In order to make information provided by non-text material (including SVG graphics) accessible, Success Criterion 1.1.1 requires the usage of a text alternative. Because they can be portrayed through any sensory modality (for example, visual, auditory, or tactile) to suit the user’s needs, text alternatives are a fundamental method of making information accessible. By including text alternatives, a wider range of user agents can present the content in different ways.
For instance, a person who is blind can request that the text equivalent of an image be read out using synthetic speech. An audio file’s text alternative can be presented for people who cannot hear it, allowing them to read it. Text alternatives will eventually make it simpler to translate information into sign language or a more basic version of the same language.
What this Accessibility Rule Checks
The algorithm for this rule returns:
-
True if the element has a
<title>code child
<svg id="target"><title>Time II: Party</title></svg>-
True if the
<title>child has text nested in another element.
<svg id="target"><title><g>Time II: Party</g></title></svg>-
False if the element has no
<title>child.
<svg id="target"></svg>-
False if the
<title>child is empty.
<svg id="target"><title></title></svg>-
False if the
<title>is a grandchild.
<svg id="target"><circle><title>Time II: Party</title></circle></svg>-
False if the
<title>child has only whitespace.
<svg id="target"><title> \t\r\n </title></svg>- False if there are multiple titles and the first is empty.
<svg id="target"><title></title><title>Time II: Party</title></svg>Markup for data tables can be tedious and perplexing. Tables should be marked up correctly in terms of header format and semantics. Table navigation is made easier by features in screen readers, but for these capabilities to function properly, the tables must be precisely marked up.
Tables are announced in a certain way by screen readers. The potential for unclear or erroneous screen reader output exists when tables are not properly marked up.
Sighted people can typically identify the table’s headers and their relevance to the data at a glance. This needs to be done in the markup for non-sighted users.
When a data table is created with accessibility in mind, the user can go from cell to cell while hearing the screen reader proclaim the matching table headers for the data cells. This is known as table navigation mode. When navigating through huge data tables or when cells include similar-sounding data that could be easily misconstrued, hearing the table headers is extremely useful.
But if the table lacks accessibility features, the table navigation method is useless.
What this Accessibility Rule Checks
Verifies the correct header structure and semantic markup of data tables.
Markup for data tables can be tedious and perplexing. Tables should be marked up correctly in terms of header format and semantics. Table navigation is made easier by features in screen readers, but for these capabilities to function properly, the tables must be precisely marked up.
Tables are announced in a certain way by screen readers. The potential for unclear or erroneous screen reader output exists when tables are not properly marked up.
Screen reader users are unable to correctly understand the relationships between the cells and their contents visually when tables are not adequately structured and marked up semantically.
What this Accessibility Rule Checks
Verifies that each header cell is referred to as a header of a column or row in data tables by checking their markup.
An image map consists of a single image with numerous clickable sections. Because screen readers cannot translate graphics into text, an image map, like all images, must contain alternative text for each of the distinct clickable parts, as well as for the larger image itself.
In the absence of alternative text, screen readers often announce the image’s filename. Filenames do not accurately describe images and are therefore inconvenient for screen reader users.
What this Accessibility Rule Checks
Ensures that image map area elements have alternative text.
ARIA attributes must be used as specified for the element’s role.
Using ARIA attributes on elements where they are not expected can result in unpredictable behavior for assistive technologies. This can lead to a poor user experience for people with disabilities who rely on these technologies. It is important to follow the ARIA specification to ensure that assistive technologies can properly interpret and communicate the intended meaning of the content.
Some ARIA attributes are only allowed on an element under certain conditions. Different attributes have different limitations to them:
aria-checked: This should not be used on an HTML input element with type=”checkbox”. Such elements have a checked state determined by the browser. Browsers should ignore aria-checked in this scenario. Because browsers do this inconsistently, a difference between the native checkbox state and the aria-checked value will result in differences between screen readers and other assistive technologies.
The aria-posinset, aria-setsize, aria-expanded, and aria-level attributes are conditional when used on a row. This can be either tr element, or an element with role="row". These attributes can only be used when the row is part of treegrid. When used inside a table or grid, these attributes have no function, and could result in unpredictable behavior from screen readers and other assistive technologies.
What this Accessibility Rule Checks
Check that ARIA attributes are not used in a way that their role describes authors should not, or must not do. I.e the use of this ARIA attribute is conditional.
Elements with aria-hidden must not contain focusable elements.
Using the property aria-hidden="true" on an element removes the element and all of its child nodes from the accessibility API, rendering the element fully unavailable to screen readers and other assistive technology.
aria-hidden may be used with extreme discretion to hide visibly displayed content from assistive technologies if the act of hiding this content is meant to enhance the experience of assistive technology users by reducing redundant or superfluous content.
If aria-hidden is employed to hide material from screen readers, the same or equal meaning and functionality must be made available to assistive technologies.
Using aria-hidden="false" on content that is a descendant of an element that is hidden using aria-hidden="true" will not reveal that content to the accessibility API, nor will it be accessible to screen readers or other assistive technology.
The rule applies to any element whose aria-hidden attribute value is true.
By adding aria-hidden="true" to an element, authors assure that assistive technologies will disregard the element.
This can be used to hide aesthetic elements, such as icon typefaces, that are not intended to be read by assistive technologies.
A focusable element with aria-hidden="true" is disregarded as part of the reading order, but is still part of the focus order, making it unclear if it is visible or hidden.
What this Accessibility Rule Checks
For all user interface components, including form elements, links, and script-generated components, the name and role can be identified programmatically; user-specified states, properties, and values can be set programmatically; and user agents, including assistive technologies, are notified of changes.