Guias de acessibilidade para WCAG 2.1 (A)

Screen readers announce definition lists in a specific way, conveying the relationship between terms (<dt>) and their descriptions (<dd>). When a <dl> element contains invalid direct children — such as <p>, <span>, or <li> elements — or when <dt> and <dd> elements appear in the wrong order, assistive technology cannot reliably parse the list. This primarily affects blind and deafblind users who depend on screen readers to understand content structure.

For example, a screen reader might announce a definition list by saying “definition list with 3 items,” then reading each term followed by its definition. If the markup is malformed, the screen reader may skip items, miscount them, or fail to associate terms with their definitions.

This rule maps to WCAG Success Criterion 1.3.1: Info and Relationships (Level A), which requires that information, structure, and relationships conveyed visually are also available programmatically. A properly structured <dl> ensures the semantic relationship between terms and definitions is preserved in the accessibility tree.

How to Fix It

Follow these rules when building definition lists:

1. Direct children of <dl> must be limited to: <dt>, <dd>, <div>, <script>, or <template> elements. No other elements (like <p>, <span>, <li>, or plain text nodes) should appear as direct children.
2. Ordering matters: One or more <dt> elements must come before one or more <dd> elements. A <dd> should never precede a <dt> within a group.
3. Using <div> as a wrapper: You may wrap a <dt>/<dd> group in a <div> for styling purposes, but each <div> must contain a complete group (at least one <dt> followed by at least one <dd>).
4. No stray content: Don’t place bare text or non-allowed elements directly inside the <dl>.

Examples

Incorrect: Invalid direct child element

The <p> element is not a valid direct child of <dl>.

<dl>
  <p>Beverage Types</p>
  <dt>Coffee</dt>
  <dd>A black hot drink made from roasted beans</dd>
</dl>

Incorrect: Wrong order of <dt> and <dd>

The <dd> element must follow the <dt>, not precede it.

<dl>
  <dd>A black hot drink made from roasted beans</dd>
  <dt>Coffee</dt>
</dl>

Incorrect: <dd> without a preceding <dt>

Every <dd> must be associated with at least one <dt>.

<dl>
  <dd>An orphan definition with no term</dd>
</dl>

Correct: Basic definition list

<dl>
  <dt>Coffee</dt>
  <dd>A black hot drink made from roasted beans</dd>
  <dt>Milk</dt>
  <dd>A white cold drink</dd>
</dl>

Correct: Multiple definitions for a single term

<dl>
  <dt>Coffee</dt>
  <dd>A black hot drink made from roasted beans</dd>
  <dd>A stimulating beverage containing caffeine</dd>
</dl>

Correct: Using <div> to wrap groups

Wrapping <dt>/<dd> groups in <div> elements is valid and useful for styling.

<dl>
  <div>
    <dt>Coffee</dt>
    <dd>A black hot drink made from roasted beans</dd>
  </div>
  <div>
    <dt>Milk</dt>
    <dd>A white cold drink</dd>
  </div>
</dl>

Correct: Multiple terms sharing one definition

<dl>
  <dt>Latte</dt>
  <dt>Café au lait</dt>
  <dd>A coffee drink made with espresso and steamed milk</dd>
</dl>

Description lists follow a specific structural hierarchy in HTML. The <dl> element defines the list, and within it, <dt> elements represent terms while <dd> elements provide their corresponding descriptions. When <dt> or <dd> elements exist outside of a <dl>, the browser has no context to establish the relationship between terms and definitions. This makes the content semantically meaningless to assistive technologies.

Screen reader users are most affected by this issue. Screen readers announce description lists with specific cues — for example, telling users they’ve entered a list, how many items it contains, and the relationship between terms and descriptions. When <dt> and <dd> elements lack a <dl> parent, these announcements don’t occur, and users who are blind or deafblind lose important structural context. Keyboard-only users and users with mobility impairments who rely on assistive technologies are also affected, as their tools may not properly navigate orphaned list items.

This rule relates to WCAG 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2 Success Criterion 1.3.1: Info and Relationships (Level A), which requires that information, structure, and relationships conveyed through presentation can be programmatically determined. A description list’s structure conveys a meaningful relationship between terms and definitions, so the proper HTML hierarchy must be in place for that relationship to be communicated to all users.

How to fix it

1. Wrap orphaned <dt> and <dd> elements inside a <dl> parent element.
2. Ensure proper ordering — <dt> elements should come before their associated <dd> elements.
3. Only place <dt> and <dd> elements (or <div> elements that group <dt>/<dd> pairs) as direct children of <dl>.
4. Each <dt> should have at least one corresponding <dd>, and vice versa, to form a complete term-description pair.

Examples

Incorrect: <dt> and <dd> without a <dl> parent

<dt>Coffee</dt>
<dd>A hot, caffeinated beverage</dd>
<dt>Milk</dt>
<dd>A cold, dairy-based drink</dd>

This is invalid because the <dt> and <dd> elements are not wrapped in a <dl>. Screen readers will not recognize these as a description list, and users will miss the term-definition relationships.

Correct: <dt> and <dd> wrapped in a <dl>

<dl>
  <dt>Coffee</dt>
  <dd>A hot, caffeinated beverage</dd>
  <dt>Milk</dt>
  <dd>A cold, dairy-based drink</dd>
</dl>

Correct: using <div> to group term-description pairs inside <dl>

HTML allows <div> elements as direct children of <dl> to group each <dt>/<dd> pair, which can be useful for styling:

<dl>
  <div>
    <dt>Coffee</dt>
    <dd>A hot, caffeinated beverage</dd>
  </div>
  <div>
    <dt>Milk</dt>
    <dd>A cold, dairy-based drink</dd>
  </div>
</dl>

Incorrect: <dd> nested inside an unrelated element

<div>
  <dd>This description has no list context</dd>
</div>

A <dd> inside a <div> (or any non-<dl> parent) is invalid. Replace the <div> with a <dl> and add a corresponding <dt>:

<dl>
  <dt>Term</dt>
  <dd>This description now has proper list context</dd>
</dl>

The <title> element is the very first piece of information screen reader users hear when a page loads. It’s also what appears in browser tabs, bookmarks, and search engine results. When a page has no title — or has an empty or generic one like “Untitled” — screen reader users are forced to read through the page content to figure out its purpose. For users who navigate between multiple open tabs or use their browser history to find a previous page, missing or vague titles create serious barriers.

This rule relates to WCAG 2.4.2 Page Titled (Level A), which requires that web pages have titles describing their topic or purpose. Because this is a Level A criterion, it represents a minimum baseline for accessibility. The rule also aligns with Trusted Tester guideline 12.A and EN 301 549.

The users most affected by missing or poor page titles include:

• Screen reader users (blind and deafblind users), who rely on the title as the first orientation cue when a page loads
• Users with cognitive disabilities, who benefit from clear, descriptive titles to understand where they are
• Keyboard-only users and anyone navigating between multiple tabs, who use titles to distinguish pages

How to fix it

1. Add a <title> element inside the <head> of every HTML document.
2. Write meaningful text inside the <title> — it must not be empty or contain only whitespace.
3. Make each title unique across your site so users can distinguish between pages.
4. Put the most unique information first. If you include a site or brand name, place it at the end (e.g., “Contact Us – Acme Corp” rather than “Acme Corp – Contact Us”). This way, screen reader users hear the distinguishing content immediately instead of listening to the same brand name on every page.
5. Align the title with the page’s <h1> heading. They don’t need to be identical, but they should be closely related since both describe the page’s purpose.
6. Avoid placeholder text like “Untitled,” “Page 1,” or “New Document.”

Beyond accessibility, descriptive titles improve SEO since search engines use them to filter, rank, and display results.

Examples

Incorrect: missing <title> element

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <meta charset="utf-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <h1>Our Products</h1>
  </body>
</html>

This page has no <title> element at all. Screen reader users will hear no identifying information when the page loads.

Incorrect: empty <title> element

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <meta charset="utf-8">
    <title></title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <h1>Our Products</h1>
  </body>
</html>

A <title> element is present but contains no text, which is equivalent to having no title.

Incorrect: generic or placeholder title

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <meta charset="utf-8">
    <title>Untitled Document</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <h1>Our Products</h1>
  </body>
</html>

While technically not empty, a placeholder title provides no useful information about the page’s content.

Correct: descriptive and unique title

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <meta charset="utf-8">
    <title>Our Products – Acme Corp</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <h1>Our Products</h1>
  </body>
</html>

The title clearly describes the page content, places the unique information first, and includes the site name at the end for context. It also closely matches the <h1> heading on the page.

Why This Is an Accessibility Problem

In HTML, the id attribute is designed to be a unique identifier for a single element in the document. When two or more elements share the same id, the browser has no reliable way to determine which element is being referenced. This becomes a critical accessibility barrier when that id is used to create relationships between elements — such as linking a <label> to a form input, or connecting a description to a widget via aria-describedby.

Assistive technologies like screen readers rely on these id-based relationships to communicate information to users. When duplicates exist, the screen reader will typically resolve the reference to the first element in the DOM with that id, which may not be the intended target. This means:

• A blind or deafblind user may hear the wrong label for a form field, or no label at all.
• An ARIA relationship like aria-labelledby or aria-describedby may point to the wrong content, giving users incorrect or missing context.
• Interactive components that depend on aria-owns, aria-controls, or aria-activedescendant may break entirely.

This rule relates to WCAG Success Criterion 4.1.2: Name, Role, Value (Level A), which requires that all user interface components have accessible names and roles that can be programmatically determined. Duplicate id values used in ARIA or label associations directly undermine this requirement by creating ambiguous or broken programmatic relationships.

How to Fix It

1. Identify all duplicate id values that are referenced by ARIA attributes (aria-labelledby, aria-describedby, aria-controls, aria-owns, aria-activedescendant, etc.) or by a <label> element’s for attribute.
2. Rename the duplicate id values so that each one is unique within the document.
3. Update any references to those id values in ARIA attributes or for attributes to match the new unique values.
4. Verify that each relationship still works correctly by testing with a screen reader or the axe accessibility checker.

Examples

Incorrect: Duplicate id on elements referenced by for

In this example, two inputs share the same id of "email". The second <label> intends to reference the second input, but both for attributes resolve to the first input.

<label for="email">Personal Email</label>
<input type="email" id="email">

<label for="email">Work Email</label>
<input type="email" id="email">

A screen reader user tabbing to the second input would hear no label or the wrong label, making it impossible to know what information to enter.

Correct: Unique id values for each input

<label for="personal-email">Personal Email</label>
<input type="email" id="personal-email">

<label for="work-email">Work Email</label>
<input type="email" id="work-email">

Incorrect: Duplicate id referenced by aria-labelledby

<span id="section-title">Shipping Address</span>
<div role="group" aria-labelledby="section-title">
<!-- shipping fields -->

</div>

<span id="section-title">Billing Address</span>
<div role="group" aria-labelledby="section-title">
<!-- billing fields -->

</div>

Both groups would be announced as “Shipping Address” because the browser resolves both aria-labelledby references to the first <span> with id="section-title".

Correct: Unique id values for each referenced element

<span id="shipping-title">Shipping Address</span>
<div role="group" aria-labelledby="shipping-title">
<!-- shipping fields -->

</div>

<span id="billing-title">Billing Address</span>
<div role="group" aria-labelledby="billing-title">
<!-- billing fields -->

</div>

Incorrect: Duplicate id used in aria-describedby

<p id="hint">Must be at least 8 characters.</p>
<label for="password">Password</label>
<input type="password" id="password" aria-describedby="hint">

<p id="hint">Re-enter your password to confirm.</p>
<label for="confirm-password">Confirm Password</label>
<input type="password" id="confirm-password" aria-describedby="hint">

Correct: Unique id values for each description

<p id="password-hint">Must be at least 8 characters.</p>
<label for="password">Password</label>
<input type="password" id="password" aria-describedby="password-hint">

<p id="confirm-hint">Re-enter your password to confirm.</p>
<label for="confirm-password">Confirm Password</label>
<input type="password" id="confirm-password" aria-describedby="confirm-hint">

When a form field has more than one <label> element pointing to it (either via the for attribute or by nesting), assistive technologies have no reliable way to determine which label is the correct one. This inconsistency means that users who are blind, have low vision, or are deafblind may hear the wrong label, an incomplete label, or a confusing combination of labels when interacting with a form. Users with mobility impairments also benefit from properly associated labels, since a single clear <label> expands the clickable area of the associated input.

This rule relates to WCAG 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2 Success Criterion 3.3.2: Labels or Instructions (Level A), which requires that labels or instructions are provided when content requires user input. Multiple conflicting labels undermine this requirement because the user cannot reliably receive a single, clear label for the field.

How to Fix

Ensure that each form field has only one <label> element associated with it. You can associate a label with a field in one of two ways — but use only one label per field:

1. Explicit association — Use the for attribute on the <label> matching the id of the input.
2. Implicit association — Wrap the input inside the <label> element.

If you need to provide additional descriptive text beyond the label, use aria-describedby to point to supplementary instructions rather than adding a second <label>.

If you have a situation where one label must be visually hidden, hide the redundant label using CSS (display: none or visibility: hidden) so it is fully removed from the accessibility tree, and remove its for attribute. Using aria-hidden="true" alone on a <label> is not sufficient to prevent all screen readers from associating it with the field.

Examples

Incorrect: Two explicit labels for one input

Both <label> elements use for="username", causing unpredictable screen reader behavior.

<label for="username">Username</label>
<label for="username">Enter your username</label>
<input type="text" id="username" />

Incorrect: One explicit and one implicit label

The input is both wrapped in a <label> and referenced by another <label> via for.

<label for="email">Email</label>
<label>
  Email address:
  <input type="text" id="email" />
</label>

Incorrect: Nested labels

Labels should never be nested inside each other.

<label>
  Enter your comments:
  <label>
    Comments:
    <textarea id="comments"></textarea>
  </label>
</label>

Correct: Single explicit label

One <label> with a for attribute matching the input’s id.

<label for="username">Username</label>
<input type="text" id="username" />

Correct: Single implicit label

The input is wrapped inside a single <label>.

<label>
  Email address:
  <input type="text" id="email" />
</label>

Correct: Label with supplementary instructions using aria-describedby

When you need to provide extra guidance beyond the label, use aria-describedby instead of a second label.

<label for="password">Password</label>
<input type="password" id="password" aria-describedby="password-hint" />
<p id="password-hint">Must be at least 8 characters with one number.</p>

Correct: Using the title attribute as a label

When a visible label is not appropriate (rare cases), the title attribute can serve as an accessible name.

<textarea id="search" title="Search terms"></textarea>

Correct: Select inside a single label

<label>
  Choose an option:
  <select id="options">
    <option selected>Option A</option>
    <option>Option B</option>
  </select>
</label>

When a <frame> or <iframe> has tabindex="-1", the browser removes it from the sequential keyboard navigation order. This means that any focusable elements inside the frame — such as links, buttons, form controls, or other interactive elements — become completely unreachable via the keyboard. If the frame also has scrollable content, keyboard users cannot scroll it either, since focus can never enter the frame to begin with.

This creates a serious barrier for people who rely on keyboards to navigate, including blind users who use screen readers and people with mobility disabilities who cannot use a mouse. Content trapped inside an inaccessible frame is effectively hidden from these users, even though it may be fully visible on screen.

Related WCAG Success Criteria

This rule maps to WCAG 2.1 Success Criterion 2.1.1: Keyboard (Level A), which requires that all functionality be operable through a keyboard interface without requiring specific timings for individual keystrokes. When focusable content is locked inside a frame with tabindex="-1", this criterion is violated because keyboard users cannot access or interact with that content.

This is a Level A requirement — the most fundamental level of accessibility — meaning it must be met for a page to be considered minimally accessible.

How to Fix It

1. Remove tabindex="-1" from any <frame> or <iframe> that contains focusable content. Without an explicit tabindex, the browser will handle focus naturally and allow keyboard users to tab into the frame.
2. Use tabindex="0" if you need to explicitly include the frame in the tab order.
3. Only use tabindex="-1" on frames that genuinely contain no focusable or interactive content. Even then, be cautious — if the frame’s content changes later to include interactive elements, the negative tabindex will silently create an accessibility barrier.

As a general best practice, avoid using tabindex="-1" on frames entirely. It’s easy for frame content to change over time, and a negative tabindex can turn into an accidental accessibility issue after a routine content update.

Examples

Incorrect: Frame with focusable content and tabindex="-1"

The button inside this iframe is unreachable by keyboard because tabindex="-1" prevents focus from entering the frame.

<iframe
  srcdoc="<button>Click me</button>"
  tabindex="-1"
  title="Interactive widget">
</iframe>

Correct: Frame with focusable content and no negative tabindex

Removing tabindex="-1" allows keyboard users to tab into the frame and reach the button.

<iframe
  srcdoc="<button>Click me</button>"
  title="Interactive widget">
</iframe>

Correct: Frame with focusable content and tabindex="0"

Using tabindex="0" explicitly places the frame in the natural tab order.

<iframe
  srcdoc="<button>Click me</button>"
  tabindex="0"
  title="Interactive widget">
</iframe>

Correct: Frame with no focusable content and tabindex="-1"

When a frame contains only static, non-interactive content (no links, buttons, or form controls), using tabindex="-1" is acceptable because there is nothing inside that requires keyboard access.

<iframe
  srcdoc="<p>Hello world</p>"
  tabindex="-1"
  title="Static content display">
</iframe>

Screen reader users rely on frame titles to understand what each embedded region of a page contains. Many screen readers offer a feature that lists all frames on a page by their titles, allowing users to jump directly to the one they need. When frames lack titles or share identical titles, this feature becomes useless — users are left guessing which frame is which, or the screen reader falls back to unhelpful information like “frame,” “javascript,” a filename, or a URL.

This issue primarily affects users who are blind, deafblind, or who navigate with assistive technologies. It relates to WCAG 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2 Success Criterion 4.1.2: Name, Role, Value (Level A), which requires that all user interface components have an accessible name that can be programmatically determined. When frames share a title, their accessible names fail to uniquely identify them, violating this criterion. The rule is also covered by Trusted Tester guideline 12.D, which requires that the combination of accessible name and description for each <iframe> describes its content, as well as EN 301 549 section 9.4.1.2.

How to Fix It

1. Add a title attribute to every <frame> and <iframe> element.
2. Make each title unique across the page. No two frames should share the same title.
3. Make each title descriptive. The title should clearly summarize the content or purpose of the frame. Avoid generic labels like “frame” or “untitled.”
4. Match the frame’s inner document <title> to the title attribute on the frame element when possible. Some screen readers replace the frame’s title attribute with the inner document’s <title> element, so keeping them consistent ensures a reliable experience.

Tips for Writing Good Frame Titles

• Keep titles brief but informative — describe what the frame contains, not just that it exists.
• Put the most distinctive information first. If you include a brand name, place it at the end so users don’t have to hear it repeatedly while scanning a list of frames.
• Replace placeholder titles like “untitled” or “page” with meaningful descriptions.
• If the framed content has a visible heading, consider aligning the frame title with that heading for consistency.

Examples

Incorrect: Frames with Duplicate Titles

In this example, two iframes share the same title, making it impossible for screen reader users to tell them apart.

<iframe src="/news.html" title="Company Updates"></iframe>
<iframe src="/events.html" title="Company Updates"></iframe>

Incorrect: Frame with an Empty Title

An empty title provides no useful information to assistive technology users.

<iframe src="/contact.html" title=""></iframe>

Incorrect: Frames with No Title

Without any title attribute, screen readers fall back to announcing unhelpful information like the URL or “frame.”

<iframe src="/navigation.html"></iframe>
<iframe src="/main-content.html"></iframe>

Correct: Frames with Unique, Descriptive Titles

Each frame has a distinct title that clearly describes its content.

<iframe src="/news.html" title="Latest Company News"></iframe>
<iframe src="/events.html" title="Upcoming Events Calendar"></iframe>

Correct: Frame Title Matching the Inner Document Title

For the best experience, align the title attribute with the <title> element in the framed document.

<!-- Parent page -->

<iframe src="/contact.html" title="Contact Form"></iframe>

<!-- contact.html -->

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
  <title>Contact Form</title>
</head>
<body>
  <h1>Contact Us</h1>
  <form>
    <label for="email">Email</label>
    <input type="email" id="email" name="email">
    <button type="submit">Send</button>
  </form>
</body>
</html>

Correct: Hiding Decorative or Non-Content Frames

If a frame is purely decorative or contains no meaningful content for users (such as a tracking pixel), hide it from assistive technology entirely instead of giving it a misleading title.

<iframe src="/tracking-pixel.html" title="" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"></iframe>

Note that this approach should only be used when the frame genuinely contains no content that any user would need to access.

Screen reader users can pull up a list of all frames on a page and navigate between them using their titles. When frames lack accessible names, users hear generic labels like “frame,” “JavaScript,” or a raw URL — none of which convey the purpose or content of the frame. This forces users to enter each frame just to figure out what it contains, which is time-consuming and frustrating.

This issue primarily affects users who are blind or deafblind and rely on assistive technology, but it also impacts users with mobility disabilities who navigate by frame lists or landmarks.

Relevant WCAG Success Criteria

This rule relates to WCAG 2.2 Success Criterion 4.1.2: Name, Role, Value (Level A), which requires that all user interface components have a name that can be programmatically determined. Frames are interactive containers that users navigate into and out of, so they must have an accessible name.

It is also explicitly required by Section 508 (§1194.22(i)), which states that frames shall be titled with text that facilitates frame identification and navigation.

How to Fix It

Give every <iframe> and <frame> element a clear, descriptive accessible name using one of these methods:

1. title attribute — The most common approach. Add a title that briefly describes the frame’s content.
2. aria-label attribute — Provides an accessible name directly on the element.
3. aria-labelledby attribute — References another element’s text as the accessible name.

Tips for Writing Good Frame Titles

• Be brief and descriptive. A title like “Product search results” is far more useful than “frame1” or “content.”
• Make each title unique. If you have multiple frames, each one should have a distinct title so users can tell them apart.
• Match the frame’s internal document title. Some screen readers replace the frame’s title attribute with the <title> element inside the framed document. For consistency, keep them the same or very similar.
• Avoid placeholder text. Titles like “untitled” or “iframe” provide no useful information.
• Put unique information first. If you include a brand name, place it after the descriptive content so users hear the most useful information immediately.

Examples

Incorrect: <iframe> Without an Accessible Name

The frame has no title, aria-label, or aria-labelledby, so screen readers cannot describe it.

<iframe src="https://example.com/video-player"></iframe>

Incorrect: Empty title Attribute

An empty title is the same as having no title at all.

<iframe src="https://example.com/video-player" title=""></iframe>

Correct: Using the title Attribute

<iframe src="https://example.com/video-player" title="Product demo video player"></iframe>

Correct: Using aria-label

<iframe src="https://example.com/map" aria-label="Store location map"></iframe>

Correct: Using aria-labelledby

<h2 id="chat-heading">Live Chat Support</h2>
<iframe src="https://example.com/chat" aria-labelledby="chat-heading"></iframe>

Correct: Multiple Frames With Unique Titles

When a page contains several frames, each one should have a distinct, descriptive title.

<iframe src="/navigation" title="Site navigation menu"></iframe>
<iframe src="/content" title="Main article content"></iframe>
<iframe src="/ads" title="Sponsored advertisements"></iframe>

Correct: Matching the Frame Title to the Document Title

For the best experience, align the title attribute on the <iframe> with the <title> element inside the framed document.

<!-- Parent page -->

<iframe src="contact-form.html" title="Contact us form"></iframe>

<!-- contact-form.html -->

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
  <title>Contact us form</title>
</head>
<body>
  <h1>Contact Us</h1>
  <form>
    <label for="email">Email</label>
    <input type="email" id="email">
    <button type="submit">Send</button>
  </form>
</body>
</html>

Screen readers rely on distinct sound libraries for each language, with pronunciation rules, intonation patterns, and phonetics tailored to that specific language. When a user navigates to a page, the screen reader checks the lang attribute on the <html> element to determine which sound library to load. If no lang attribute is present, the screen reader falls back to whatever default language the user configured during setup. For someone who speaks multiple languages and browses websites in different languages, this creates a serious problem — the screen reader will attempt to read foreign-language content using the wrong pronunciation rules, producing garbled or incomprehensible speech.

This issue primarily affects blind and deafblind users who rely on screen readers, but it also impacts users with cognitive disabilities who may use text-to-speech tools. When text is read aloud with the wrong language rules, even simple words become unrecognizable, effectively making the content inaccessible.

Related WCAG Success Criteria

This rule maps to WCAG 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2 Success Criterion 3.1.1: Language of Page at Level A — the most fundamental level of conformance. This criterion requires that the default human language of each web page can be programmatically determined. It is also referenced by the Trusted Tester guidelines (11.A), EN 301 549, and RGAA.

How to Fix It

Add a lang attribute with a valid language code to the opening <html> element. The value should represent the primary language of the page content.

You can use a simple two-letter language code (like en for English, fr for French, or de for German), or you can be more specific with a regional dialect code like en-US for American English or fr-CA for Canadian French. A full list of valid language subtags is available in the IANA Language Subtag Registry.

If sections of your page contain content in a different language than the primary one, use the lang attribute on those specific elements so screen readers can switch sound libraries mid-page.

For languages written right to left (such as Arabic or Hebrew), also include the dir attribute with a value of rtl to indicate the text direction.

Examples

Incorrect: Missing lang attribute

This will trigger the rule because the <html> element has no lang attribute:

<html>
  <head>
    <title>My Website</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <h1>Welcome</h1>
  </body>
</html>

Correct: lang attribute with a valid language code

<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <title>My Website</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <h1>Welcome</h1>
  </body>
</html>

Correct: Using a regional dialect code

<html lang="en-US">
  <head>
    <title>My Website</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <h1>Welcome</h1>
  </body>
</html>

Correct: Handling inline language changes

When a portion of the page is in a different language, use the lang attribute on the containing element:

<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <title>My Website</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>The French word for hello is <span lang="fr">bonjour</span>.</p>
  </body>
</html>

Correct: Right-to-left language with dir attribute

<html lang="ar" dir="rtl">
  <head>
    <title>موقعي</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <h1>مرحبا</h1>
  </body>
</html>

Screen readers rely on language-specific sound libraries to pronounce text accurately. Each language has its own pronunciation rules, intonation patterns, and phonetic characteristics, so screen readers load the appropriate library based on the declared language of the document. When the <html> element has no lang attribute or contains an invalid value — such as a misspelling or a fabricated code — the screen reader cannot determine which library to use. It defaults to whatever language the user configured during setup, which means content written in French might be read aloud using English pronunciation rules. The result is speech that sounds like a confusing, unintelligible accent.

This issue primarily affects blind users and deafblind users who rely on screen readers, but it also impacts users with cognitive disabilities who may use text-to-speech tools to aid comprehension. When pronunciation is wrong, understanding drops dramatically.

Related WCAG Success Criteria

This rule maps to WCAG Success Criterion 3.1.1: Language of Page (Level A), which requires that the default human language of each web page can be programmatically determined. This is a Level A requirement — the most fundamental level of accessibility — meaning it must be satisfied for basic compliance under WCAG 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2. It is also required by the Trusted Tester methodology, EN 301 549, and RGAA.

How to Fix It

1. Add a lang attribute to the opening <html> element.
2. Set its value to a valid BCP 47 language tag that represents the primary language of the page.
3. Double-check the spelling of the language code. Common valid codes include "en" (English), "fr" (French), "es" (Spanish), "de" (German), "ja" (Japanese), and "ar" (Arabic).
4. You can optionally include a regional subtag, such as "en-US" for American English or "fr-CA" for Canadian French.
5. For XHTML documents served as XML, use xml:lang instead of or in addition to lang.

If the language changes within the document for specific passages, use the lang attribute on the appropriate element to indicate the switch. For right-to-left languages, also include the dir="rtl" attribute.

Examples

Incorrect: Missing lang attribute

<html>
  <head>
    <title>My Page</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Welcome to my website.</p>
  </body>
</html>

Without a lang attribute, screen readers cannot determine the page language and will default to the user’s configured language, which may not match the content.

Incorrect: Invalid lang value

<html lang="english">
  <head>
    <title>My Page</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Welcome to my website.</p>
  </body>
</html>

The value "english" is not a valid BCP 47 language tag. The correct code for English is "en".

Correct: Valid lang attribute

<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <title>My Page</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Welcome to my website.</p>
  </body>
</html>

Correct: Regional subtag

<html lang="fr-CA">
  <head>
    <title>Ma page</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Bienvenue sur mon site web.</p>
  </body>
</html>

Correct: Language change within the page

<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <title>Multilingual Page</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>This paragraph is in English.</p>
    <p lang="es">Este párrafo está en español.</p>
  </body>
</html>

Correct: Right-to-left language

<html lang="ar" dir="rtl">
  <head>
    <title>صفحتي</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>مرحبا بكم في موقعي.</p>
  </body>
</html>

The dir="rtl" attribute ensures the text direction is correctly rendered for right-to-left languages like Arabic and Hebrew.

The lang attribute tells browsers and assistive technologies what language the content is written in. The xml:lang attribute serves the same purpose but comes from the XML/XHTML specification. When both attributes are present on the same element—most commonly the <html> element—they must agree on the base language. The “base language” is the primary language subtag (e.g., en in en-US or fr in fr-CA). If one attribute says en and the other says fr, assistive technologies receive conflicting information and cannot reliably determine how to process the content.

Who is affected

This issue primarily impacts screen reader users, including people who are blind, deafblind, or have cognitive disabilities. Screen readers maintain separate pronunciation libraries for each language. When they encounter a language declaration, they switch to the appropriate library so words are spoken with correct pronunciation and cadence. A mismatch between lang and xml:lang can cause the screen reader to select the wrong library or behave unpredictably, making the content difficult or impossible to understand.

Users who speak multiple languages and browse sites in different languages are especially vulnerable, as they rely on accurate language declarations to switch between language contexts.

Related WCAG success criteria

This rule relates to WCAG Success Criterion 3.1.1: Language of Page (Level A), which requires that the default human language of each web page can be programmatically determined. This criterion applies across WCAG 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2, as well as EN 301 549 and RGAA. When lang and xml:lang conflict, the programmatically determined language becomes ambiguous, violating this requirement.

How to fix it

1. Check the <html> element (and any other elements) for the presence of both lang and xml:lang attributes.
2. Ensure both attributes use the same base language. For example, if lang="en", then xml:lang must also start with en (e.g., en, en-US, or en-GB).
3. If you don’t need xml:lang, the simplest fix is to remove it entirely. The lang attribute alone is sufficient for HTML5 documents.
4. If you’re serving XHTML, both attributes may be required. In that case, keep them in sync.

You can find valid language codes on the ISO 639 language codes reference page. Common codes include en for English, fr for French, es for Spanish, de for German, and ar for Arabic.

Examples

Incorrect: mismatched base languages

The lang attribute specifies English, but xml:lang specifies French. This creates a conflict that confuses assistive technologies.

<html lang="en" xml:lang="fr">
  <head>
    <title>My Page</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Hello, world!</p>
  </body>
</html>

Correct: matching base languages

Both attributes specify English. The dialect subtag may differ, but the base language (en) is the same.

<html lang="en-US" xml:lang="en-GB">
  <head>
    <title>My Page</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Hello, world!</p>
  </body>
</html>

Correct: identical values

The simplest and most reliable approach—use the exact same value for both attributes.

<html lang="en" xml:lang="en">
  <head>
    <title>My Page</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Hello, world!</p>
  </body>
</html>

Correct: only lang attribute (HTML5)

In HTML5 documents, the xml:lang attribute is not required. Using lang alone avoids any possibility of a mismatch.

<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <title>My Page</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Hello, world!</p>
  </body>
</html>

Correct: specifying language on inline elements

When content in a different language appears within the page, use the lang attribute on the appropriate element. If you also use xml:lang, make sure they match.

<p>Welcome to our site. <span lang="es" xml:lang="es">Bienvenidos a nuestro sitio.</span></p>

For right-to-left languages, also include the dir attribute:

<p lang="ar" xml:lang="ar" dir="rtl">مرحبا بكم في موقعنا</p>

Images are a fundamental part of web content, but they are inherently visual. Screen readers cannot interpret the pixels of an image — they rely entirely on a text alternative to describe the image’s content and purpose to the user. Without alternative text, a screen reader may read out the image’s file name (e.g., “IMG_20230415_093012.jpg”), which is meaningless and confusing. In the worst case, the image is silently skipped, and the user misses critical information.

This rule primarily affects people who are blind or deafblind, who depend on screen readers or braille displays to access content. Users with low vision who rely on text magnification or high-contrast modes can also benefit from well-written alternative text.

Why This Matters

This rule maps to WCAG 2.2 Success Criterion 1.1.1: Non-text Content (Level A), which requires that all non-text content presented to the user has a text alternative that serves an equivalent purpose. It is also required by Section 508 and EN 301 549. Because it is a Level A requirement, it represents the absolute minimum baseline for accessibility — failing it means your content is fundamentally inaccessible to many users.

How to Provide Alternative Text

There are three main techniques for giving an image accessible alternative text:

1. The alt attribute — the most common and preferred method for <img> elements.
2. The aria-label attribute — provides an accessible name directly on the element.
3. The aria-labelledby attribute — points to the id of another element that contains the descriptive text.

Writing Good Alt Text

When writing alternative text, consider these questions:

• Why is this image here? What role does it play in the content?
• What information does it convey? What would a sighted user take away from it?
• If you removed the image, what words would replace it to preserve the same meaning?

Keep alt text concise and descriptive. Avoid phrases like “image of” or “picture of” — screen readers already announce the element as an image. Don’t use the file name as alt text. Focus on the image’s purpose and meaning, not a pixel-by-pixel description.

Handling Decorative Images

Not every image carries meaning. Decorative images — such as visual separators, background flourishes, or images whose content is fully described in surrounding text — should be hidden from assistive technology. To do this, use an empty alt attribute: alt="".

Do not omit the alt attribute entirely. If alt is missing, screen readers will often fall back to reading the file name, which creates a worse experience than having no announcement at all. An empty alt="" explicitly tells the screen reader to skip the image.

You can also use role="presentation" or role="none" to mark an image as decorative, but an empty alt attribute is simpler and more widely supported.

Examples

Incorrect: Missing Alt Text

The alt attribute is completely absent. A screen reader may announce the file name instead.

<img src="team-photo.jpg">

Incorrect: Unhelpful Alt Text

The alt text contains the file name rather than a meaningful description.

<img src="chart-q3.png" alt="chart-q3.png">

Correct: Descriptive Alt Text Using the alt Attribute

<img src="team-photo.jpg" alt="The engineering team gathered around a whiteboard during a planning session">

Correct: Alt Text Using aria-label

<img src="revenue-chart.png" aria-label="Bar chart showing quarterly revenue increasing from $2M in Q1 to $3.5M in Q4">

Correct: Alt Text Using aria-labelledby

<p id="chart-desc">Bar chart showing quarterly revenue growth from Q1 to Q4 2024.</p>
<img src="revenue-chart.png" aria-labelledby="chart-desc">

Correct: Decorative Image with Empty Alt

This separator line serves no informational purpose and should be hidden from screen readers.

<img src="decorative-line.svg" alt="">

Correct: Decorative Image Using role="presentation"

<img src="decorative-swirl.png" role="presentation">

What This Rule Checks

This axe-core rule (image-alt) inspects every <img> element on the page and verifies that it has an accessible text alternative. Specifically, it checks that each <img> has at least one of the following:

• A non-empty alt attribute
• An aria-label attribute
• An aria-labelledby attribute that references a valid element
• An empty alt="" (or role="presentation" / role="none") to indicate the image is decorative

If none of these conditions are met, the rule flags the image as a critical accessibility violation.

Every interactive control on a page needs an accessible name so that assistive technologies can announce it to users. For <input> elements with type="button", type="submit", or type="reset", the accessible name typically comes from the value attribute. While <input type="submit"> and <input type="reset"> have default browser-provided labels (“Submit” and “Reset”), <input type="button"> has no default — it renders as an empty, unlabeled button if no name is provided.

This issue critically affects blind and deafblind users who rely on screen readers. When a screen reader encounters an input button without discernible text, it may announce something like “button” with no indication of what the button does. This makes it impossible to navigate forms, submit data, or perform actions confidently. Sighted users can often infer a button’s purpose from visual context, but screen reader users depend entirely on the programmatic accessible name.

Related WCAG Success Criteria

This rule maps to WCAG 2.2 Success Criterion 4.1.2: Name, Role, Value (Level A), which requires that all user interface components have a name that can be programmatically determined. It also relates to Section 508 requirements that every non-text element must have a text equivalent, and EN 301 549 Section 9.4.1.2.

How to Fix It

There are several ways to give an input button a discernible accessible name:

1. value attribute — The most straightforward approach. Set value to descriptive text that communicates the button’s purpose.
2. aria-label attribute — Provides an accessible name directly. Useful when you need the accessible name to differ from the visible text, or when value cannot be used.
3. aria-labelledby attribute — References another element’s id whose text content becomes the accessible name. The referenced element must exist and contain text.
4. title attribute — Acts as a fallback accessible name. However, title is less reliable because it is not consistently exposed by all assistive technologies and only appears as a tooltip on hover, making it inaccessible to keyboard and touch users. Prefer value or aria-label instead.

For <input type="submit"> and <input type="reset">, browsers provide default labels, so they pass without an explicit value. However, if you set value="" (an empty string), you override the default and create an empty accessible name, which fails.

Examples

Incorrect: Input button with no accessible name

<form action="/search">
  <input type="button" id="go" />
</form>

This button has no value, aria-label, aria-labelledby, or title. A screen reader will announce it as just “button” with no context.

Incorrect: Empty aria-label

<form action="/search">
  <input type="button" aria-label="" />
</form>

An empty aria-label does not provide a discernible name.

Incorrect: aria-labelledby referencing a nonexistent or empty element

<form action="/search">
  <input type="button" aria-labelledby="nonexistent" />
</form>

<form action="/search">
  <input type="button" aria-labelledby="empty-label" />
  <div id="empty-label"></div>
</form>

If the referenced element doesn’t exist or has no text content, the button has no accessible name.

Incorrect: Submit or reset with an empty value

<form action="/search">
  <input type="submit" value="" />
  <input type="reset" value="" />
</form>

Setting value to an empty string overrides the browser’s default label, leaving the button unnamed.

Correct: Using the value attribute

<form action="/search">
  <input type="button" value="Search" />
</form>

Correct: Using aria-label

<form action="/search">
  <input type="button" aria-label="Search" />
</form>

Correct: Using aria-labelledby

<form action="/search">
  <input type="button" aria-labelledby="btn-label" />
  <span id="btn-label">Search</span>
</form>

Correct: Submit and reset with default or explicit values

<form action="/search">
  <input type="submit" />
  <input type="reset" />
  <input type="submit" value="Send Form" />
  <input type="reset" value="Clear All Fields" />
</form>

The first two rely on the browser’s built-in default labels (“Submit” and “Reset”). The last two provide custom, more descriptive labels through the value attribute. Both approaches are valid, though explicit descriptive labels are generally preferred for clarity.

An <input type="image"> element renders an image that functions as a submit button. Unlike standard <input type="submit"> buttons that display their value attribute as visible text, image buttons rely entirely on their visual appearance to communicate purpose. This means assistive technologies have no way to determine the button’s function unless you explicitly provide alternative text.

This is a critical accessibility barrier for several groups of users. Blind and deafblind users who rely on screen readers will hear something generic like “button” or, worse, the image file name (e.g., “btn_submit_v2.png”), which provides no useful information. Users with low vision who use screen magnifiers in combination with screen readers are similarly affected. Without a clear accessible name, these users cannot confidently interact with forms.

This rule relates to two WCAG success criteria at Level A — the minimum conformance level:

• WCAG 1.1.1 (Non-text Content): All non-text content must have a text alternative that serves the equivalent purpose. An image button is non-text content, so it needs alternative text.
• WCAG 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value): All user interface components must have a programmatically determinable name. Buttons must expose their name to assistive technologies.

This requirement is also mandated by Section 508, EN 301 549, and the Trusted Tester guidelines.

How to fix it

Provide a non-empty accessible name for every <input type="image"> element using one of these methods:

1. alt attribute (preferred): Add an alt attribute that describes the button’s action. This is the most straightforward and widely supported approach.
2. aria-label attribute: Set an aria-label with a concise description of the button’s action.
3. aria-labelledby attribute: Reference the id of another visible element that describes the button’s action.

Writing effective alternative text

The alternative text for an image button should describe the action the button performs, not the image itself. Ask yourself: “What happens when the user clicks this button?” The answer is your alternative text.

• ✅ “Submit”, “Search”, “Add to cart”, “Log in”
• ❌ “Green arrow icon”, “button.png”, “click here”

Avoid filler words like “image of” or “button” — assistive technologies already announce the element’s role as a button.

Important: Simply placing text next to the image button in the HTML is not sufficient. Screen readers need a programmatically associated label, not visually adjacent text. Nearby text cannot be reliably determined as the button’s label by assistive technologies.

Examples

Incorrect: missing alternative text

The image button has no alt, aria-label, or aria-labelledby attribute. A screen reader might announce this as “submit.png button” or just “button.”

<form action="/search">
  <label for="query">Search</label>
  <input type="text" id="query" name="q">
  <input type="image" src="search-icon.png">
</form>

Incorrect: empty alt attribute

An empty alt attribute tells assistive technologies to ignore the element, effectively hiding the button entirely.

<input type="image" src="search-icon.png" alt="">

Correct: using the alt attribute

<form action="/search">
  <label for="query">Search</label>
  <input type="text" id="query" name="q">
  <input type="image" src="search-icon.png" alt="Search">
</form>

Correct: using aria-label

<input type="image" src="submit-arrow.png" aria-label="Submit order">

Correct: using aria-labelledby

The aria-labelledby attribute points to the id of a visible element. Make sure the referenced element exists and is not hidden with display: none or aria-hidden="true".

<h2 id="checkout-heading">Complete your purchase</h2>
<form action="/checkout">
<!-- form fields -->

  <input type="image" src="checkout-btn.png" aria-labelledby="checkout-heading">
</form>

What the rule checks

This rule verifies that every <input type="image"> element has a discoverable accessible name. It fails if the element has no alt, aria-label, or aria-labelledby attribute, or if those attributes are empty or resolve to an empty string.

Every form element — such as text inputs, checkboxes, radio buttons, and select menus — must have a programmatically associated label so that assistive technologies can identify and announce the purpose of each field. Without these labels, screen reader users cannot determine what information is expected, and users with motor impairments lose the benefit of a larger clickable target area that a properly associated <label> provides.

Why This Matters

When a form element lacks a programmatic label, screen readers either announce it generically (e.g., “edit text” or “checkbox”) or skip meaningful context entirely. This leaves blind, low-vision, and deafblind users unable to understand what data a field expects or what option a checkbox represents. They must guess based on surrounding content, which is unreliable and error-prone.

Labels also benefit users with motor impairments. When a <label> element is properly associated with an input, clicking the label text activates or focuses the associated control. This creates a larger click target, which is especially helpful for people with limited dexterity.

Sighted users often rely on visual proximity to infer a field’s purpose, but assistive technologies need an explicit programmatic relationship between the label text and the form control to convey the same information.

Relevant Standards

This rule maps to WCAG Success Criterion 4.1.2: Name, Role, Value (Level A), which requires that all user interface components have an accessible name that can be programmatically determined. It applies across WCAG 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2, as well as Section 508 (§1194.22(n)), EN 301 549 (9.4.1.2), and Trusted Tester guidelines. The user impact is considered critical.

How to Fix It

There are several ways to associate a label with a form element. Use the approach that best fits your situation, listed here from most recommended to least recommended.

1. Explicit <label> with for and id (Recommended)

The most common and reliable method is to use a <label> element whose for attribute matches the id of the form control. This creates an unambiguous programmatic association.

2. Implicit <label> (Wrapping)

Wrap the form control inside a <label> element. The association is implied by the parent-child relationship.

3. aria-label

Use aria-label when the field’s purpose is conveyed visually through an icon or layout rather than visible text. This creates an invisible label that only screen readers announce.

4. aria-labelledby

Use aria-labelledby when the label text already exists elsewhere on the page, or when you need to combine multiple pieces of text into a single label. Reference one or more element id values.

5. placeholder (Not Recommended)

A placeholder attribute can technically provide an accessible name, but it disappears once the user begins typing, removing the visible label. This creates usability problems for everyone and is not a recommended approach.

General Tips

• Ensure all id values are unique on the page.
• Make label text descriptive and meaningful when read aloud in isolation.
• Remember that buttons (<button>, <input type="submit">, etc.) are self-labeling through their text content or value attribute and do not need a separate <label>.
• Hidden inputs (<input type="hidden">) do not need labels since they are not presented to users.

Examples

Incorrect: Input without a label

<div>First name:</div>
<input type="text" id="firstname">

The <div> text is visually near the input, but there is no programmatic relationship. A screen reader will announce only “edit text” with no context.

Correct: Explicit label with for and id

<label for="firstname">First name:</label>
<input type="text" id="firstname">

Correct: Implicit label by wrapping

<label>
  First name:
  <input type="text">
</label>

Correct: aria-label for visually implied fields

<input type="text" aria-label="Search">
<button type="submit">🔍</button>

Correct: aria-labelledby referencing existing text

<div id="temp-label">Temperature</div>
<div id="high-label">High:</div>
<div id="low-label">Low:</div>

<input type="text" aria-labelledby="temp-label high-label">
<input type="text" aria-labelledby="temp-label low-label">

The first input is announced as “Temperature High:” and the second as “Temperature Low:”, combining the referenced text in order.

Incorrect: Relying only on placeholder

<input type="text" placeholder="Enter your email">

While this technically provides an accessible name, the visible hint disappears when the user starts typing, making it difficult to verify the field’s purpose. Always prefer a persistent visible label.

Correct: Visible label with supplementary placeholder

<label for="email">Email address</label>
<input type="text" id="email" placeholder="name@example.com">

Incorrect: Checkbox without a label

<input type="checkbox" id="terms">
I agree to the terms and conditions

The text is adjacent but not associated with the checkbox.

Correct: Labeled checkbox

<input type="checkbox" id="terms">
<label for="terms">I agree to the terms and conditions</label>

Why This Matters

Many users cannot perceive color differences reliably. Approximately 8% of men and 0.4% of women have some form of color vision deficiency, and there are nearly three times more people with low vision than those who are totally blind. For these users, if a link within a paragraph is styled only with a different color — say, blue text in a block of black text — it can be completely invisible as a link.

People with low vision often experience reduced contrast sensitivity, meaning everything appears roughly the same brightness. Without a non-color cue like an underline or a sufficient luminance difference, these users cannot detect that certain text is interactive. This can cause them to miss important navigation, actions, or information entirely.

This rule relates to WCAG 2.0/2.1/2.2 Success Criterion 1.4.1: Use of Color (Level A), which requires that color is not used as the only visual means of conveying information, indicating an action, or distinguishing a visual element. Links embedded in text are one of the most common places where this requirement is violated.

How the Rule Works

The axe rule link-in-text-block checks links that appear inside blocks of text (such as paragraphs) and evaluates them in three steps:

1. Non-color distinction present → Pass. If the link has a visual style that doesn’t depend on color — such as an underline, a border, a background color, or a distinct font weight/style — the rule passes automatically.

2. No non-color distinction and contrast below 3:1 → Fail. If the link relies only on color and the contrast ratio between the link text color and the surrounding text color is less than 3:1, the rule fails.

3. No non-color distinction but contrast is 3:1 or higher → Needs Review. If the link relies only on color but meets the 3:1 contrast threshold, the rule flags it for manual testing. You must verify that the link receives a distinct visual style (such as an underline) on :focus and :hover states.

How to Fix It

The simplest and most reliable fix is to give links a non-color visual indicator. Here are your options, in order of recommendation:

• Underline the link — This is the most universally understood link indicator.
• Add a border — A border-bottom can work as an alternative to text-decoration.
• Use a distinct font style — Bold or italic can help, though underline is more conventional for links.
• Add a background or outline — A subtle background color difference can work if it’s clearly visible.

If you choose to rely on color contrast alone (3:1 minimum between link text and surrounding text), you must also ensure the link gains a distinct non-color style on :hover and :focus. This two-part requirement exists because static contrast alone may not be sufficient for all users, but a visual change on interaction confirms the element is interactive.

Examples

Incorrect: Link distinguished only by color with insufficient contrast

<style>
  p { color: #333333; }
  a { color: #555555; text-decoration: none; }
</style>

<p>
  Learn more about our
  <a href="/services">consulting services</a>
  and how we can help.
</p>

In this example, the link has no underline and the color contrast between #555555 and #333333 is well below 3:1. Users with low vision or color blindness cannot identify the link.

Correct: Link has an underline (recommended)

<style>
  p { color: #333333; }
  a { color: #0056b3; text-decoration: underline; }
</style>

<p>
  Learn more about our
  <a href="/services">consulting services</a>
  and how we can help.
</p>

The underline provides a clear non-color visual cue, making the link identifiable regardless of color perception.

Correct: Link uses a bottom border instead of underline

<style>
  p { color: #333333; }
  a {
    color: #0056b3;
    text-decoration: none;
    border-bottom: 2px solid #0056b3;
  }
</style>

<p>
  Read our
  <a href="/guide">accessibility guide</a>
  for detailed instructions.
</p>

Correct: Color-only link with sufficient contrast plus hover/focus styles

<style>
  p { color: #333333; }
  a {
    color: #0000ee;
    text-decoration: none;
  }
  a:hover,
  a:focus {
    text-decoration: underline;
  }
</style>

<p>
  Visit our
  <a href="/help">help center</a>
  for answers to common questions.
</p>

Here the contrast between #0000ee and #333333 exceeds 3:1, and the link gains an underline on hover and focus. This satisfies the requirement, though note that axe will still flag this for manual review since it cannot automatically verify the hover/focus styles in all cases.

Incorrect: Underline removed with no replacement

<style>
  a { color: #1a73e8; text-decoration: none; }
  p { color: #000000; }
</style>

<p>
  Check out our
  <a href="/blog">latest blog posts</a>
  for updates.
</p>

Even though the blue color may seem obvious to sighted users with full color vision, removing the underline without providing another non-color indicator makes this link invisible to users with color blindness or low contrast sensitivity.

Links are one of the most fundamental interactive elements on the web. When a link lacks an accessible name, screen reader users hear something like “link” with no further context, making it impossible to understand the link’s purpose or destination. This affects people who are blind, deafblind, or have low vision and rely on screen readers, as well as keyboard-only users who navigate through links sequentially.

A link’s accessible name can come from several sources: its visible text content, an aria-label attribute, an aria-labelledby reference, a title attribute, or the alt text of an image contained within it. If none of these provide a non-empty string, the link has no discernible text, and this rule will flag it.

Beyond just having text, links must also be programmatically focusable. Avoid relying on device-specific JavaScript events like onmouseover or mouseout(), which are inaccessible to keyboard users. Use device-independent alternatives like onfocus, onblur, focus(), and blur(). Additionally, don’t hide link text from assistive technologies using display: none, visibility: hidden, or aria-hidden="true" on the link or its text content.

It’s also important to use semantic <a> elements with a valid href attribute rather than simulating links with <span> or <div> elements and click handlers. Real links are focusable by default and convey the correct role to assistive technologies.

Related WCAG Success Criteria

This rule relates to two Level A success criteria that apply across WCAG 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2:

• WCAG 2.4.4 (Link Purpose in Context): Users must be able to determine the purpose of each link from the link text alone, or from the link text combined with its programmatically determined context.
• WCAG 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value): All user interface components, including links, must have an accessible name and role that can be programmatically determined.

This rule is also required under Section 508, EN 301 549, and Trusted Tester guidelines.

How to Fix It

1. Add visible text content inside the <a> element.
2. For image links, provide meaningful alt text on the <img> element.
3. Use aria-label when you need to provide an accessible name that differs from or supplements the visible text.
4. Use aria-labelledby to reference another element’s text as the link’s accessible name.
5. Don’t hide link text from screen readers with aria-hidden="true" or CSS that removes elements from the accessibility tree.
6. Ensure links are focusable by using proper <a> elements with href attributes and avoiding mouse-only event handlers.

Examples

Empty link (incorrect)

A link with no text or accessible name:

<a href="/settings"></a>

A link that only contains an image with no alt text:

<a href="/home">
  <img src="logo.png" alt="">
</a>

A link with its text hidden from assistive technologies:

<a href="/profile">
  <span aria-hidden="true">Profile</span>
</a>

Link with visible text (correct)

<a href="/settings">Settings</a>

Image link with descriptive alt text (correct)

<a href="/home">
  <img src="logo.png" alt="Homepage">
</a>

Link with aria-label (correct)

This is useful when multiple links share the same visible text, such as repeated “Read more” links:

<h3>Accessibility Updates</h3>
<p>New WCAG 2.2 guidelines have been published.
  <a href="/wcag22" aria-label="Read more about WCAG 2.2 updates">Read more</a>
</p>

<h3>Screen Reader Tips</h3>
<p>Learn how to navigate tables with a screen reader.
  <a href="/sr-tips" aria-label="Read more about screen reader tips">Read more</a>
</p>

Link with aria-labelledby (correct)

<h3 id="report-title">Annual Report 2024</h3>
<a href="/report-2024.pdf" aria-labelledby="report-title">Download PDF</a>

Icon link with visually hidden text (correct)

For links that use icons without visible text, use a visually hidden <span> to provide an accessible name:

<a href="/search">
  <svg aria-hidden="true" focusable="false">
    <use href="#icon-search"></use>
  </svg>
  <span class="visually-hidden">Search</span>
</a>

The visually-hidden class hides the text visually but keeps it available to screen readers:

.visually-hidden {
  position: absolute;
  width: 1px;
  height: 1px;
  padding: 0;
  margin: -1px;
  overflow: hidden;
  clip: rect(0, 0, 0, 0);
  white-space: nowrap;
  border: 0;
}