HTML Guide
The height property in your CSS containing invalid or too many values. The height property should have only one valid length, percentage, or keyword value.
Valid Values for height Property:
-
Length values:
px,em,rem, etc. (e.g.,100px,10em) -
Percentage values: (e.g.,
50%) -
Keyword values:
auto,max-content,min-content,fit-content,inherit,initial,unset
Example of Incorrect Usage:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<style>
.example {
height: 100px 50px; /* Incorrect: Too many values */
}
</style>
<title>Height Property Example</title>
</head>
<body>
<div class="example">Content</div>
</body>
</html>Example of Correct Usage:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<style>
.example {
height: 100px; /* Correct: One valid value */
}
</style>
<title>Height Property Example</title>
</head>
<body>
<div class="example">Content</div>
</body>
</html>Learn more:
Related W3C validator issues
The <table> element does not accept a height attribute. Use CSS instead.
The W3C HTML Validator issue you encountered indicates that the value of the height attribute for an <img> element is set to “100%”, which is not allowed in HTML. The height attribute must be a specific digit that represents the height in pixels (e.g., “150”), rather than a percentage or any other unit.
How to Fix the Issue
To resolve this issue, you need to specify a numeric value for the height attribute instead. If you want the image to occupy a certain percentage of the container, use CSS instead of the height attribute.
Example of Incorrect HTML
Here is an example that causes the validation issue:
<img src="image.jpg" height="100%" alt="Example Image">Corrected HTML Using Pixel Values
To correct the issue, replace the percentage with a pixel value:
<img src="image.jpg" height="200" alt="Example Image">Alternative: Using CSS for Responsive Design
If you want the image to scale responsively and occupy 100% of the width of its container, consider using CSS:
<style>
.responsive-img {
width: 100%;
height: auto; /* Maintains aspect ratio */
}
</style>
<img src="image.jpg" class="responsive-img" alt="Example Image">Summary
- Do not use percentage values for the height attribute of <img> tags.
- Use pixel values for fixed dimensions.
- For responsive design, use CSS to set the dimensions instead.
The width and height attributes on <img> elements expect a digit to specify the dimension in pixels. It should not contain units, letters or percent signs.
You can achieve this using CSS instead, for example:
<!-- Invalid syntax, the height attribute expects only digits -->
<img src="photo.jpg" alt="cat" height="auto" />
<!-- Valid syntax using CSS -->
<img src="photo.jpg" alt="cat" style="height: auto" />The attributes width and height of <iframe> elements expect a non-negative integer, so an empty string is not allowed. Either define the correct dimension, or remove this attribute.
The attributes width and height of <img> elements expect a non-negative integer, so an empty string is not allowed. Either define the correct dimension, or remove this attribute.
To query for the size of the viewport (or the page box on page media), the width, height and aspect-ratio media features should be used, rather than device-width, device-height and device-aspect-ratio, which refer to the physical size of the device regardless of how much space is available for the document being laid out. The device-* media features are also sometimes used as a proxy to detect mobile devices. Instead, authors should use media features that better represent the aspect of the device that they are attempting to style against.
The width media feature describes the width of the targeted display area of the output device. For continuous media, this is the width of the viewport including the size of a rendered scroll bar (if any).
In the following example, this media query expresses that the style sheet is only linked if the width of the viewport 768px maximum:
<link rel="stylesheet" media="only screen and (max-width: 768px)" href="styles.css">To query for the size of the viewport (or the page box on page media), the width, height and aspect-ratio media features should be used, rather than device-width, device-height and device-aspect-ratio, which refer to the physical size of the device regardless of how much space is available for the document being laid out. The device-* media features are also sometimes used as a proxy to detect mobile devices. Instead, authors should use media features that better represent the aspect of the device that they are attempting to style against.
The width media feature describes the width of the targeted display area of the output device. For continuous media, this is the width of the viewport including the size of a rendered scroll bar (if any).
In the following example, this media query expresses that the style sheet is only linked if the width of the viewport is greater than 768px:
<link rel="stylesheet" media="only screen and (min-width: 768px)" href="styles.css">The <iframe> element, used to embed another document inside the current document, accepts both attributes width and height which must be valid non-negative integers. Percentages are not allowed for these attributes.
<video> elements accept a height attribute to specify the width in CSS pixels. This value can only be an integer, it should not contain units or %. If you need to specify a percentage width, you can do that with CSS.
Here’s an example of setting width and height on a video element.
<video controls width="640" height="480">
<source src="/media/cc0-videos/flower.webm" type="video/webm">
</video>The attributes width and height on an iframe expect a valid positive integer without any decimals.
Here’s an example of incorrect code where decimals are being used for dimension attributes:
<iframe src="example.html" height="602.88" width="800.2"></iframe>Corrected code without decimals:
<iframe src="example.html" height="603" width="800"></iframe>In the corrected code, the width and height values has been changed to a whole number, which conforms to the standard integer value expected by the W3C validator.